
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
How C-reactive protein outpaced ‘bad’ cholesterol as leading heart disease risk marker - 2
Two Endangered Bengal Tiger Cubs Die Days Apart at Zoo After Contracting Virus - 3
Exposure to neighborhood violence leads some Denver teens to use tobacco and alcohol earlier, new study shows - 4
Auschwitz Committee wants German auction of Holocaust items scrapped - 5
A 3-limbed Kemp's ridley sea turtle is now being tracked at sea by satellite
Artemis II astronauts are more than halfway to the moon as they seek to break Apollo 13's record
Finding the Universe of Workmanship: Individual Encounters in Imagination
Yemen’s Aden airport shut by STC-backed transport minister, Saudi source says
Famous Kitchen Finishing Styles For 2024
74 suicide warnings and 243 mentions of hanging: What ChatGPT said to a suicidal teen
Bondi Beach survivor criticizes police for inaction during terror attack
Step by step instructions to Buy a Jeep Wrangler on a Senior's Spending plan
Scaling New Levels: Rock Climbing Spots On the planet
4 Energy-Proficient Clothes washers to Consider in 2024













